<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for CodingThis.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://codingthis.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://codingthis.com</link>
	<description>Software Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:56:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Programming Language &#124; .NET Multiple Inheritance Issue by David Ziffer</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/programming/net/programming-language-net-multiple-inheritance-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-24395</link>
		<dc:creator>David Ziffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?p=614#comment-24395</guid>
		<description>You seem to be justifying the lack of MI here by saying that a similar effect can be achieved using multiple interfaces. Yes we can achieve a &quot;similar effect&quot; by being forced to copy all the code from all the classes from which we are unable to inherit (because they are not the one class from which we are inheriting). We could also justify the absence of single inheritance using this same argument. Just use an interface instead and copy the code from the class from which we want to inherit. Apparently it is of little concern to everyone that this creates a staggering maintenance problem (every try keeping 10 or 20 supposedly identical copies of the same code in sync?). Any argument against multiple inheritance could just as easily be used to argue against single inheritance. Let&#039;s instead just call the absence of MI in .NET what it is: a massive shortcoming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be justifying the lack of MI here by saying that a similar effect can be achieved using multiple interfaces. Yes we can achieve a &#8220;similar effect&#8221; by being forced to copy all the code from all the classes from which we are unable to inherit (because they are not the one class from which we are inheriting). We could also justify the absence of single inheritance using this same argument. Just use an interface instead and copy the code from the class from which we want to inherit. Apparently it is of little concern to everyone that this creates a staggering maintenance problem (every try keeping 10 or 20 supposedly identical copies of the same code in sync?). Any argument against multiple inheritance could just as easily be used to argue against single inheritance. Let&#8217;s instead just call the absence of MI in .NET what it is: a massive shortcoming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HR Certification Questions about TIME MANAGEMENT by Rohit Vijay</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/uncategorized/hr-certification-questions-about-time-management/comment-page-1/#comment-14016</link>
		<dc:creator>Rohit Vijay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-14016</guid>
		<description>Any links for answers ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any links for answers ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SAP HR Certifications Sample Questions Set 4 by Ashok</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/uncategorized/sap-hr-certifications-sample-questions-set-4/comment-page-1/#comment-13956</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 17:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-13956</guid>
		<description>Hi!

Hope all is well at your end.

Could you please provide answers for the above questions. 

Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi!</p>
<p>Hope all is well at your end.</p>
<p>Could you please provide answers for the above questions. </p>
<p>Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on JetBrains Rolls Out Competitor For Objective C Development by Brad</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/programming/objective-c/jetbrains-rolls-out-competitor-for-objective-c-development/comment-page-1/#comment-13865</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 17:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?p=2814#comment-13865</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the preview!  Any mention of a PC version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the preview!  Any mention of a PC version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Started (for Free!) with Amazon Elastic Cloud Computing (EC2) by Danny</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/platforms/ec2/getting-started-for-free-with-amazon-elastic-cloud-computing-ec2/comment-page-1/#comment-13455</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?p=1448#comment-13455</guid>
		<description>I should also mention that after a good 15 minutes or more of Googling &quot;cloud computing&quot; etc. this is the only thing I found that actually talks about moving from virtual hosting to cloud computing, instead of comparing it against maintaining your own servers on-site. That may have to do with the fact that I (embarrassingly?) never knew the term &quot;virtual hosting&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also mention that after a good 15 minutes or more of Googling &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; etc. this is the only thing I found that actually talks about moving from virtual hosting to cloud computing, instead of comparing it against maintaining your own servers on-site. That may have to do with the fact that I (embarrassingly?) never knew the term &#8220;virtual hosting&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Getting Started (for Free!) with Amazon Elastic Cloud Computing (EC2) by Danny</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/platforms/ec2/getting-started-for-free-with-amazon-elastic-cloud-computing-ec2/comment-page-1/#comment-13454</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?p=1448#comment-13454</guid>
		<description>This is an absolutely awesome series of articles. It&#039;s exactly what I was looking for: Someone to get in the water first and tell me &quot;The water&#039;s great! Come on in!&quot;. For those of us who aren&#039;t server nerds, but are still techies of some sort and could eventually figure all this out, it saves A LOT of time that would otherwise be spent drooling and staring blankly into the computer screen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an absolutely awesome series of articles. It&#8217;s exactly what I was looking for: Someone to get in the water first and tell me &#8220;The water&#8217;s great! Come on in!&#8221;. For those of us who aren&#8217;t server nerds, but are still techies of some sort and could eventually figure all this out, it saves A LOT of time that would otherwise be spent drooling and staring blankly into the computer screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Outlook Synchronization does not work correctly when multiple contacts have similar names stored in several address books in Microsoft Outlook and some other issues we found by Ashtin</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/applications/microsoft-dynamics/outlook-synchronization-does-not-work-correctly-when-multiple-contacts-have-similar-names-stored-in-several-address-books-in-microsoft-outlook-and-some-other-issues-we-found/comment-page-1/#comment-13332</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashtin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 06:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?guid=40cd595a93c7099e17938680cf6ec6b3#comment-13332</guid>
		<description>Good Article about Microsoft Outlook errors...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Article about Microsoft Outlook errors&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Upload Files to Your Amazon EC2 Server using WinSCP by Mayuresh Mulye</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/applications/uploading-files-to-your-amazon-ec2-server-using-winscp/comment-page-1/#comment-13252</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayuresh Mulye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 06:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?p=1571#comment-13252</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

I have installed FreeSSHd on my Widows 2008 server, it is a Amazon cloud instance.
I get connection timed out error when connecting to it.
I have opened SSH port in Security group settings on AWS console.

Can you please help me with this ?

Regards,
Mayuresh Mulye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>I have installed FreeSSHd on my Widows 2008 server, it is a Amazon cloud instance.<br />
I get connection timed out error when connecting to it.<br />
I have opened SSH port in Security group settings on AWS console.</p>
<p>Can you please help me with this ?</p>
<p>Regards,<br />
Mayuresh Mulye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When OAuth Goes Wrong: Debugging Signature Mismatch Issues in PHP by Trey Jones</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/programming/php/when-oauth-goes-wrong-debugging-signature-mismatch-issues-in-php/comment-page-1/#comment-12636</link>
		<dc:creator>Trey Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 15:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?p=1056#comment-12636</guid>
		<description>I want to thank you almost 1 year after you wrote this for pointing me to the netflix tester, and also for making a mention of not encoding things the proper amount of times.

In fact my final problem was this:  instead of having key-&gt;value pairs encoded correctly  for SBS ------ 

encode(key)+&#039;=&#039;+encode(value)

I had done this:

encode(key+value) such that the &#039;=&#039; was encoded twice along with the rest of the string (this made sense to me!)

And thank you also for taking such a disdainful tone toward the signature generation process.  It has been a royal pain in my ass for about 24 hours.  I think I dreamt of it last night.  For all the massive amounts of specifics in the oauth documentation, it&#039;s really not specific enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to thank you almost 1 year after you wrote this for pointing me to the netflix tester, and also for making a mention of not encoding things the proper amount of times.</p>
<p>In fact my final problem was this:  instead of having key-&gt;value pairs encoded correctly  for SBS &#8212;&#8212; </p>
<p>encode(key)+&#8217;='+encode(value)</p>
<p>I had done this:</p>
<p>encode(key+value) such that the &#8216;=&#8217; was encoded twice along with the rest of the string (this made sense to me!)</p>
<p>And thank you also for taking such a disdainful tone toward the signature generation process.  It has been a royal pain in my ass for about 24 hours.  I think I dreamt of it last night.  For all the massive amounts of specifics in the oauth documentation, it&#8217;s really not specific enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Point a Domain to an Amazon EC2 Virtual Server by Reader</title>
		<link>http://codingthis.com/platforms/ec2/how-to-point-a-domain-to-an-amazon-ec2-virtual-server/comment-page-1/#comment-11962</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://codingthis.com/?p=1558#comment-11962</guid>
		<description>&#039;which uses the tag&#039;
should have said &#039;which uses the META tag&#039;
(but the editor stripped out the original &#039;meta&#039; because I&#039;d enclosed it in angle-brackets - guess it strips out HTML).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;which uses the tag&#8217;<br />
should have said &#8216;which uses the META tag&#8217;<br />
(but the editor stripped out the original &#8216;meta&#8217; because I&#8217;d enclosed it in angle-brackets &#8211; guess it strips out HTML).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

